Jeremy Harper. Get yours at flagrantdisregard.com/flickr

Critical Mass

A long, long time ago, back when Blog Jones was still on Blogger, I wrote a post about a group called Critical Mass. On the last Friday of every month, this group clogs the streets of major US cities with thousands and thousands of bicycles. See the Wikipedia entry to see what I mean.

Well, yesterday I received an email from a guy whom I quoted in my first post on the topic. Here’s what I quoted from him in my first entry:

“We rode in the street and used the streets as a place to be, and socialize, and celebrate rather than just a place to pass through on your way to someplace,” says Joel Pomerantz, one of the original San Francisco riders

Now I’ll quote his email, with appropriate commentary, of course:

I only today stumbled upon your interesting commentary, which echoes comments I have heard many times before. If you are being up front and truthful that it is the delay to drivers which troubles you about Critical Mass, then there is one slight logic glitch you might want to think about.

It’s rare that any car driver “caught” by Critical Mass is delayed more than a few minutes–putting the delay well within the range that any reasonable driver expects from “regular” car traffic jams when driving in a city at rush hour.

So, apparently, it’s OK to inconvenience thousands of drivers, as long as it’s only for a little while.

If on the other hand your objections about the ride are something else (hinted at by the disdain oozing from your phrase “the car is obviously a faster, more efficient way”) then maybe you should write a commentary directly on that point. I would love to see your reasoned evidence that speed and efficiency are what make the world a better place. Many people think so for various reasons, but judging by the surge in the bicycle’s popularity for transportation, it seems that in some circumstances many people would rather have two hours a month where calm prevails in public spaces usually overwhelmed by motor traffic.

What you don’t see is the distinct lack of calm on the faces of the drivers you’re inconveniencing.

The roads–at least the parts of the road where cars drive on–are not for socialization. They are for getting from once place to another as quickly as possible. You should stay out of the way of the delivery men who are trying to do an honest day’s work, the ambulances which trying to get the sick and the dying to the hospital, the policemen, who are trying to prevent crimes, and the regular folks, who just want to get home and relax after a difficult week’s work.

Yes, speed and efficiency make the world a better place. Absolutely. If you doubt that, look at the places in the world where efficiency is apparently irrelevant, like the vast majority of Latin America and Africa: The people there are dirt poor. By consequence, they are hungry, sick, and without the things we in the first world would consider necessities, like regular electricity and indoor plumbing. On the other hand, look at the countries in the first world: The peoples of America and Japan prize efficiency, and so they are healthy, wealthy, and full.

Further, when your transit times are lower, you can spend more time doing the things you love to do. If I’m held up in traffic for a half-hour because a swarm of cyclists won’t get out of my way, that’s half an hour I can’t spend with my family, on my computer, or doing any of the things I enjoy. It seems profoundly selfish to me that these cyclists are enjoying themselves at the expense of thousands of others enjoying themselves.

As I said in my previous post, socialize all you want. Celebrate bike riding. But have the civility to stay out of the way of people with more important things to do.

2 Responses to “Critical Mass”

  1. momtoast Says:

    There are two extreme points of view represented here:

    1. Speed and efficiency are irrelevent and are not part of what makes the world a better place.
    2. Speed and efficiency are the main factor that make the world a better place.

    I’m in the middle. Yes, there are examples of countries that do not prize efficiency and are suffering for it, but there are examples of the opposite also. Take the Amish for instance (not all of whom are only in the US) who willingly live without electricity and cars. They are wealthy, healthy, and full.

    And are the US and Japan really so well off? Wealthy, yes. But healthy? Obesity and stress-related illnesses are reaching new heights in the US. Full? Busy maybe, but I wouldn’t say that most Americans are living full lives. They fill their high-speed and efficiency spare time with a load of activities that only add more stress to their lives.

    However, I also agree that your enjoyment should not be taken at the expense of other’s lives. Speed and efficiency are wonderful in emergency situations, in catching criminals, and in getting more work done to the benefit of consumers and businesses alike. We have made a great amount of progress and it is helping a great amount of people.

    Just don’t make this progress all-important. The real factor in all of this (success, health, wealth, making the world a better place) is people.

  2. Blog Jones Says:

    I actually meant full in the baser sense, as in “not starving.” :smile:

    You know, even if the Critical Mass folks wanted to organize some kind of Bike Festival with their local cities, that’d be fine. My only problem is when they get in the way of other drivers. It’s just rude.

Leave a Reply

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: