Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/jharp741/public_html/blogjones/WordPress/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/jharp741/public_html/blogjones/WordPress/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/jharp741/public_html/blogjones/WordPress/wp-includes/theme.php on line 508
Blog Jones » Blog Archive » What if the RIAA and the MPAA get their way?

Jeremy Harper. Get yours at flagrantdisregard.com/flickr

What if the RIAA and the MPAA get their way?

Just a brief word of background first: The RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) and the MPAA (Moving Pictures Association of America) are evil incarnate. As examples, the RIAA once sued a 12-year-old girl for thousands of dollars because she traded music on Kazaa, and the MPAA keeps trying to push “Broadcast Flag” legislation through Congress that would allow television executives to decide whether or not you should be able to record their shows and how long you should be able to keep them. They’re the ones responsible for things like DRM, which prevent you from putting music you buy off of iTunes onto any non-Apple MP3 player and which brought us the joy of the Sony Root-Kit fiasco that hid files from you, the customer, on your own computer if you used one of the DRM-infested CDs.

So, what happens if these guys get their way in the future? Tarmle gives us a hint:

Going to the movies is not what it used to be. Security at the studio-owned theatres is heavy, it’s not a trip to be taken lightly. But if you want to see the film everyone is talking about without waiting a year for the home release, you have little choice. When you enter the lobby the first thing you see are long ranks of tiny, thumbprint activated lockers. This is where you must leave all of your electronics, your personal server and peripherals, even your watch, and you had better not be wearing smart spectacles or contacts. As you enter the security zone you’re scanned for anything you may have forgotten. Cochlea and optical implants must be capable of responding with a coded RF identification signal to indicate their systems are secure and cannot record. People with older models, or models implanted abroad where such interrogation is illegal, are turned away. Perhaps they would like to see one of the older releases? Once through the scanner you must submit to a biometric ID test - this is where the known bloggers, hackers and spoilers are ejected. Finally there is the non-disclosure agreement to be signed - these days most moviegoers choose to sign via the MPAAs annual subscription, just trying to take some of the hassle out of visiting the cinema. Finally you get to see the film. In the auditorium the audience is constantly scanned by an AI looking for suspicious activity, so don’t rummage in your pockets for too long. It’s strange that all this effort to protect the movie industry has done so little to improve the movies.

There’s more; read the whole thing. Especially interesting is the bibliography at the end, which I have duplicated in the extended entry for the BJU “Livejournal-impaired” dorm students. (Yes, I know, “Can any good thing come out of LiveJournal?” The answer is yes.)

The music and movie industries just don’t get it: How can they ever expect to gain market share when they keep deliberately trying to frustrate their customers’ desires?


Some browsing material for your (dis)pleasure, in no particular order:
Cinemas as police-states [BoingBoing.net]
UK cinema copyright warnings: a call to action [BoingBoing.net]
Trusted Computing: Promise and Risk [EFF.org - Electronic Frontier Foundation]
Your General-Purpose PC –> Hollywood-Approved Entertainment Appliance [EFF.org]
Protected Media Path, Component Revocation, Windows Driver Lockdown [EFF.org]
Analog Hole Bill Introduced [EFF.org]
New Senate Broadcast Flag Bill Would Freeze Fair Use [arstechnica.com]
Big Content would like to outlaw things no one has even thought of yet [arstechnica.com]
The Dangers of Device Authentication [EFF.org]
Battle for the digital bookshelf gains momentum [NewScientist.com]
Quantum cryptography network gets wireless link [NewScientist.com]
MP3 creators to add copy protection [NewScientist.com]
Movie & Music Industry Proposals ISP Self-Regulation [ConstitutionalCode.blogspot.com]
MPAA want control of both technology and customers. [Corante.com - broken layout]
The 15 enemies of the Internet and other countries to watch [rsf.org]
France about to get worst copyright law in Europe? [BoingBoing.net]
French Government Lobbied to Ban Free Software [FSFFrance.org]
eucd.info - Site created to face the threat from the French copyright overhaul.
What If Copyright Law Were Strongly Enforced in the Blogosphere? [ConcurringOpinions.com]
Study: how Canadian copyright law is bought by entertainment co’s [BoingBoing.net]
Vatican ‘cashes in’ by putting price on the Pope’s copyright [TimesOnline.co.uk]
Shirky: stupid (c) laws block me from publishing own work online [BoingBoing.net]
The Copyrighting of Public Space [NewUrbanist.blogspot.com]
Jamming device aims at camera phones [news.com.com]
Yet another account of a paranoia-tinged screening [Defamer.com]
No taking pix of San Fran building from the sidewalk? [BoingBoing.net]
A-Hole bill would make a secret technology into the law of the land [BoingBoing.net]

Previously in this blog:
An e-Paper Manifesto
Remember when music used to come on coasters?
Overpriced, Dusty Chunks of Pulverised Rainforest: An Endangered Species
Random Music Generators Save the Earth
How to Save Music
Digital Analogy Management

6 Responses to “What if the RIAA and the MPAA get their way?”

  1. filosofo Says:

    So, if you’re as young as 12, stealing then distributing music is okay?

  2. Blog Jones Says:

    No, of course not. She shouldn’t have been distributing the songs in violation of copyright.

    But it isn’t reasonable to assume that she knew that what she was doing was illegal. Furthermore, it’s despicable to sue her for thousands of dollars.

  3. Faustus Says:

    Recently, there’s been a push to start charging music stores licensing rights. Why? Because customers looking at guitars frequently try out known, copywritten riffs to see if they like how it plays and want to buy. And no, I’m not kidding.

    RIAA et al certainly don’t help their cause with crap like that and the whole DRM thing.

  4. filosofo Says:

    But it isn’t reasonable to assume that she knew that what she was doing was illegal.

    Why not? Everyone knows it’s illegal. If she was smart enough to figure out how to find the music and how to serve back to others, I think it’s reasonable to assume she knew it was illegal. Twelve-year-olds aren’t stupid.

    Furthermore, it’s despicable to sue her for thousands of dollars.

    Not really. By redistributing the music, she was aiding in the theft of thousands of dollars worth of music.

  5. FigueroaEdwina20 Says:

    Some time before, I needed to buy a car for my organization but I didn’t have enough cash and couldn’t purchase something. Thank heaven my fellow proposed to try to get the home loans at reliable creditors. Thence, I did so and used to be happy with my short term loan.

  6. online essays Says:

    Do not buy useless stuff and pay money for essay help service, which will aid you to build your career.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.